笔记:
因此,正如我所想到的,真正的问题是因为我使用了用于tagid的IN子句。 更改用于文本搜索的查询部分并没有太大帮助。任何想法如何改善查询?
在服务器上运行时,查询花费的时间太长。在此,Partha S是用户输入的搜索项目。表联系人包含个人信息,标签包含类别名称和ID;和contacts2tags表包含contactid和tagid,其值分别类似于contacts和tag中的id。
SELECT * FROM ( SELECT *, IF ( first_name LIKE 'Partha S' OR last_name LIKE 'Partha S' OR phone_number LIKE 'Partha S' OR mobile_number LIKE 'Partha S' OR email_address LIKE 'Partha S' OR address LIKE 'Partha S' OR organization LIKE 'Partha S' OR other LIKE 'Partha S' OR sector LIKE 'Partha S' OR designation LIKE 'Partha S' OR concat ( first_name, ' ', last_name ) LIKE 'Partha S' OR concat ( last_name, ' ', first_name ) LIKE 'Partha S', 1, 0 ) as exact, IF ( ( first_name LIKE '%Partha%' OR last_name LIKE '%Partha%' OR phone_number LIKE '%Partha%' OR mobile_number LIKE '%Partha%' OR email_address LIKE '%Partha%' OR address LIKE '%Partha%' OR organization LIKE '%Partha%' OR other LIKE '%Partha%' OR sector LIKE '%Partha%' OR designation LIKE '%Partha%' ) AND ( first_name LIKE '%S%' OR last_name LIKE '%S%' OR phone_number LIKE '%S%' OR mobile_number LIKE '%S%' OR email_address LIKE '%S%' OR address LIKE '%S%' OR organization LIKE '%S%' OR other LIKE '%S%' OR sector LIKE '%S%' OR designation LIKE '%S%' ) , 1, 0 ) as normal FROM contacts WHERE id in ( SELECT DISTINCT contacts.id from contacts INNER JOIN contacts2tags ON contacts.id = contacts2tags.contactid WHERE ( tagid in ( 178 ) ) ) ) d WHERE exact = 1 OR normal = 1 ORDER BY exact desc, last_name asc LIMIT 0, 20
更新: 根据建议,我删除了LIKE运算符以进行精确搜索,并在后一种情况下使用MATCH(..)AGAINST(..)代替了LIKE。尽管第一个更改确实改善了性能,但是使用MATCH()AGAINST()并不会意外地改变执行时间。这是更新的查询。PS我尝试将MATCH(所有列)AGAINST(搜索项)和MATCH(单列)AGAINST(搜索项)与OR结合使用。请提出建议。谢谢
SELECT * FROM ( SELECT *, IF ( first_name ='Partha S' OR last_name ='Partha S' OR phone_number ='Partha S' OR mobile_number ='Partha S' OR email_address = 'Partha S' OR address ='Partha S' OR organization ='Partha S' OR other ='Partha S' OR sector ='Partha S' OR designation ='Partha S' OR concat ( first_name, ' ', last_name ) ='Partha S' OR concat ( last_name, ' ', first_name ) ='Partha S', 1, 0 ) as exact, IF ( match(first_name,last_name,phone_number,mobile_number,email_address, address,organization,other,sector,designation) against( 'Partha') OR match(first_name,last_name,phone_number,mobile_number,email_address,address,organization,other,sector,designation) against( 'S') , 1, 0 ) as normal FROM contacts WHERE id in ( SELECT DISTINCT contacts.id from contacts INNER JOIN contacts2tags ON contacts.id = contacts2tags.contactid WHERE ( tagid in ( 178 ) ) ) ) d WHERE exact = 1 OR normal = 1 ORDER BY exact desc, last_name asc LIMIT 0, 20
一种优化是在这种exact情况下,您不需要使用LIKE(只应将其与通配符-%一起使用)。
exact
为了使事情更快,您可以做的另一件事是将INDEX添加到要搜索的文件中。
此外,只有当你使用MyISSAM作为存储引擎(该表),您可以使用 全文搜索 这样的
SELECT * FROM normalWHERE MATCH(title,body)AGAINST(’Queried_string’)
normal
first_name LIKE '%S%' OR last_name LIKE '%S%' OR phone_number LIKE '%S%' OR mobile_number LIKE '%S%' OR email_address LIKE '%S%' OR address LIKE '%S%' OR organization LIKE '%S%' OR other LIKE '%S%' OR sector LIKE '%S%' OR designation LIKE '%S%' )
似乎给整个过程带来的价值很小。
希望这可以帮助。